The TX12 and TX16S, each with their unique features and price points, cater to different segments of the RC community. This comparison aims to dissect their differences in hardware, software, and overall utility. Whether you’re a beginner looking for a cost-effective solution or a seasoned enthusiast seeking advanced features, understanding these nuances will guide you to a decision that aligns with your specific requirements and budget. Let’s delve into the intricate details of the TX12 and TX16S to determine which transmitter stands out as the best fit for you.
Detailed Point-by-point Comparisons
Size and Weight
The TX12 is smaller and lighter, with dimensions of 170x159x108 millimeters and a weight of 363 grams. This makes it a great choice for those with smaller hands or for those who often travel and need something compact and easy to fit in a backpack. Its lighter weight also means it’s more comfortable to use for extended periods without feeling too heavy.
On the other hand, the TX16S is larger, measuring 287x129x184 millimeters, and heavier at 750 grams (excluding the battery). Its size and weight are due to its more advanced features, larger screen, and bigger battery capacity. While it might be less portable and heavier, it offers more functionality, which could be a trade-off for the added size and weight.
In terms of gimbals, there’s a notable difference between the TX12 and the TX16S.
The TX12 comes with a standard precision potentiometer gimbal. This type of gimbal is quite reliable and offers decent accuracy for most remote control needs. It’s a solid choice for everyday use and for those who are into RC hobbies but don’t necessarily need super high precision.
The TX16S, however, steps it up a notch. It offers two options: the V4.0 Hall gimbal and the AG01 CNC Hall gimbal. Hall sensor gimbals, like these, are known for their higher precision and durability compared to potentiometer gimbals. They use magnetic fields to detect movement, which generally results in smoother and more accurate control. This can make a big difference in activities requiring very precise movements. The CNC aspect of the AG01 means it’s made with computer-controlled machining, ensuring even greater precision and quality.
Display and Switch Knobs
The TX12 has a basic 128×64 monochrome LCD display. This small and simple screen aligns with the compact design of the TX12. It’s adequate for basic needs, but it’s not particularly flashy or feature-rich. This kind of display might be just fine for FPV drone or quadcopter pilots, who often don’t need to constantly check the screen for detailed information during flight.
In contrast, the TX16S boasts a much more impressive 4.3-inch full-color TFT touch screen with a resolution of 480×272. This larger, color, touch-sensitive display significantly enhances the user experience, offering better visibility and easier interaction. It’s particularly advantageous for flying RC airplanes and aircraft, where you need to regularly monitor telemetry data and other flight details. The vivid and interactive display of the TX16S is a huge plus in such scenarios, where the smaller screen of the TX12 might seem inadequate.
Hardware and Circuitry
The TX16S outshines the TX12 in hardware and circuitry. While the TX12 employs a basic CC2500 RF chip, suitable for standard use, it’s pretty basic. The TX16S, on the other hand, boasts improved internal circuitry, with a focus on power efficiency and safety. A key feature is its reverse polarity protection, safeguarding against incorrect battery insertion. Additionally, it supports faster charging with a 2.2A USB-C port. This means quicker, more convenient charging sessions. These upgrades make the TX16S not only more advanced but also user-friendly and safer. For those prioritizing advanced tech and safety, the TX16S is the better choice.
Protocols and Compatibility
The TX16S stands out in terms of protocol support and compatibility compared to the TX12. While the TX12 supports a range of protocols like Corona, Hitec, Futaba S-FHSS, Frsky D16/D8, and can use external modules like JR/FrSKY/Crossfire, it’s somewhat limited.
The TX16S takes it further, offering compatibility with even more protocols, including FrSKY X/X2 LBT and DSMX. A standout feature is its built-in support for the Team Black Sheep MicroTX module. This means the TX16S not only accommodates a wider range of receivers but also offers greater flexibility with module compatibility and software switching capabilities.
Battery and Additional Functions
The TX16S takes the lead in power and additional features over the TX12. While the TX12 uses a li-ion 5000mAh battery, the TX16S steps up with a 2s lipo 6200mAh battery, offering longer battery life for extended use. The TX16S also boasts a more efficient and safer charging solution with its built-in USB-C port, making charging more convenient.
Additionally, the TX16S is packed with advanced features: smooth-operating knobs, sliders for precise control, dual built-in speakers for better audio feedback, an upgraded aesthetic design, and customizable back grips for a personalized feel.
Conclusion: Which is Better?
In conclusion, when deciding between the TX12 and TX16S, it really comes down to your specific needs and budget. The TX12 is a solid, budget-friendly choice, offering basic functionality, decent battery life, and support for multiple protocols. It’s ideal for those new to RC hobbies or for users who prefer a simpler, more compact device for basic use.
On the other hand, the TX16S, while more expensive, offers significantly more features. Its longer battery life, advanced gimbals, wider range of protocols, and additional features like dual speakers, USB-C charging, and customizable grips make it a superior choice for serious hobbyists or those who need a more robust and versatile transmitter.
So, if budget is a concern and your needs are basic, the TX12 is a great choice. But if you’re looking for advanced features and greater versatility, and are willing to invest a bit more, the TX16S is definitely the better option. Ultimately, the best choice depends on balancing your specific needs with how much you’re willing to spend.