In the world of RadioMaster, two models often come to the forefront – the TX12 and the Pocket. Each offers unique features, catering to different preferences in size, functionality, and price. In this comparison, we’ll explore the nuances of both models to help you make an informed decision that aligns with your specific RC needs, whether you’re a seasoned enthusiast or a beginner in the hobby. Let’s delve into the details to see which model, the TX12 or the Pocket, emerges as the ideal companion for your RC adventures.
Detailed Basic Comparisons
Size, Weight, and Portability
When you’re looking at the size, weight, and portability of the RadioMaster TX12 and the Pocket, they each have their own charm, but they’re really playing in different leagues.
So, the TX12 is a bit of a traditionalist. It’s got that classic remote controller vibe with its size being 170 x 159 x 108 mm and weighing around 363 grams. It’s like the trusty old school radio controller – a bit on the larger side, and with a weight that feels substantial in your hands. If you’re used to the conventional RC controllers, the TX12 will feel right at home. But, it’s not exactly the kind of thing you’d just toss in your backpack and forget about it. It’s got presence, you know?
Now, the Pocket is like the nimble little cousin in the family. It’s sleek, compact, and pretty lightweight at just 288 grams. When it’s folded, it measures 156.6 x 65.1 x 125.3 mm, which is pretty handy. This little guy is all about portability. It’s got removable ends and a foldable antenna, so it’s super easy to just slip it into your bag and go. Fewer buttons, sure, but it still gets the job done. The Pocket is a dream for those who are always on the move. You know, for the drone enthusiasts who love to fly their whoops and toothpicks. You can pretty much pack everything in a small bag, including the Pocket, and you’re good to go. Super convenient for spontaneous flying sessions.
OpenTX and EdgeTX
The RadioMaster TX12 runs on OpenTX, which is like the classic, well-established firmware in the RC world. It’s known for its reliability and extensive user base. OpenTX is great if you love a proven, stable system and don’t mind waiting a bit longer for updates.
On the flip side, the Pocket uses EdgeTX, the newer, more dynamic sibling of OpenTX. It’s all about bringing faster updates and innovative features to the table. EdgeTX is ideal for those who want the latest and greatest in firmware, with regular improvements and new functionalities.
RF Chip and Supported Protocols
The TX12 is like the Swiss Army knife of radio controllers. It’s got a CC2500 multi-protocol chip that supports a wide variety of protocols – think Corona, Hitec, Futaba S-FHSS, Frsky D16/D8, RadioLink, Graupner HoTT. It’s pretty much ready to handle whatever you throw at it, making it super versatile.
The Pocket, however, plays a different game. It offers versions with either the same CC2500 multi-protocol chip or an ELRS 2.4GHz option. This means you can choose a version based on your specific needs. It’s like having a more tailored approach to your radio control.
Gimbals, Buttons & Switches, and Screen
TX12: This one’s got high precision potentiometer gimbals, which are a big plus for those who are into that detailed, precise control. Plus, it’s loaded with plenty of buttons and switches, making it super handy for all sorts of control and programming tasks. It’s like your trusty control station with all the bells and whistles you need for a solid flying experience.
Pocket: Here, we’re looking at Hall effect gimbals. They’re generally more durable and offer smoother operation, but they’re smaller and have a limited range of motion. The smaller screen, buttons, and switches add to its compact design, making it less prone to damage. It’s kind of like the sleek, minimalist version of a controller, focused on durability and portability.
Observation: If you’re someone who’s used to a specific size and range of motion in your gimbals, the TX12 might feel more comfortable and familiar. Its high precision offers a more refined control experience. The Pocket, while great for portability and durability, might not cut it for those who prefer larger gimbals and more extensive controls. So, if it’s about detailed control and a rich array of options, the TX12 takes the lead. But for a more travel-friendly, durable design, the Pocket has its own appeal.
Customization and Design
TX12: This one is all about ergonomic design, fitting comfortably in your hand no matter how you hold it. It’s designed for functionality, ensuring a good grip for both ‘thumbers’ and ‘pinchers’.
Pocket: Here’s where it gets fun with customization. The Pocket offers a variety of colors, allowing you to personalize its look to your taste. It’s like choosing a phone case – you get to show off your style.
Expandability
TX12: It comes with a module bay compatible with JR/FrSKY/Crossfire modules, giving you plenty of room to expand and add on as needed. It’s like having a base model car that you can trick out with all the extras.
Pocket: Also has an external module bay, but it doesn’t specify the compatibility as extensively as the TX12.
Conclusion: Which is Better?
If you prioritize a traditional, more comprehensive control experience with a wide range of supported protocols, the TX12 is an excellent choice. Its ergonomic design, high precision controls, and expandability make it ideal for seasoned enthusiasts or those who prefer a substantial, feature-rich controller.
On the other hand, if portability, budget-friendliness, and modern firmware are your top considerations, the Pocket stands out. Its compact size, innovative EdgeTX firmware, and customizable design cater to users who are constantly on the move, beginners in the hobby, or those looking for a secondary, travel-friendly controller.
Leave a Reply