Today, we’re comparing two popular models: the Futaba 4PM and the Flysky Noble NB4. Each of these transmitters brings unique features to the table, catering to different aspects of RC enthusiasm. Whether you’re a competitive racer seeking precision and speed, or an RC hobbyist looking for comfort and versatility, understanding the nuances of these devices is key. Join us as we delve into the strengths and considerations of the Futaba 4PM and NB4, helping you make an informed decision for your RC adventures
Tip About the 4PM Plus Version: The 4PM Plus is the newest version of the 4PM. It has updated software that fixes bugs and now supports direct control of Kyosho’s Mini-Z series RC cars. Other than that, there’s nothing particularly special. Therefore, the 4PM Plus is similar to the 4PM, with the main distinction being this added functionality.
Detailed Basic Comparisons
Ergonomic Design
Starting with the Flysky NB4, its metal finish gives it a bit more heft compared to the mostly plastic 4PM. Now, whether that’s a plus or a minus really depends on personal preference. Some folks like the solid, weighty feel of metal, while others prefer something lighter. However, there’s no denying that both of these transmitters are designed for comfort during extended use.
A huge plus for the NB4 is its 180-degree rotating wheel mount. This feature is a game-changer, especially for customization buffs or left-handed users who often struggle to find a comfortable position with standard transmitters. Being able to adjust the wheel’s angle to suit your personal grip style can make a significant difference in comfort, especially during long RC sessions.
On the other hand, while the Futaba 4PM might be a bit larger in size, it’s generally lighter due to its plastic construction. This can reduce fatigue during prolonged use. Also, its ergonomic design ensures a comfortable grip and easy access to controls.
Price
The 4PM is a bit pricier than the NB4. This extra cost is linked to the brand value. Futaba is a big name in the RC hobby world, compared to Flysky. But if we focus just on these two models, the NB4 really offers bang for your buck. It’s worth noting that both the NB4 and 4PM have had few quality issues reported, like loss of control, and they’ve both received solid thumbs-up from users.
So, when it comes to value for money, the NB4 edges ahead. You’re getting a great transmitter without the premium price tag of a big brand like Futaba. But if brand reputation and that extra bit of trust in a well-known name is important to you, and you don’t mind spending a little more, the 4PM is still a solid choice. It’s all about what you value more – brand prestige or cost-effectiveness.
Response Speed
In terms of response speed, Futaba’s 4PM has the upper hand with its T-FHSS SR (Super Response) technology. This feature really shines in the world of racing cars where quick response to speed is crucial. It’s top-notch for anyone into competitive racing and looking for that extra edge in responsiveness.
On the flip side, Flysky Noble NB4 also boasts solid response accuracy. It’s generally more suited for slower-paced vehicles like crawlers and monster trucks. Users appreciate its reliability — no runaway cars and hardly any lag to speak of.
Programming and Software
When it comes to programming and software, Futaba’s 4PM definitely has an edge, thanks to its long-standing technical expertise. They’ve nailed the finer details, like program structure and stability, particularly in unique or challenging situations. This attention to detail in programming is something where Futaba often outshines other manufacturers.
On the other hand, the NB4, while solid in its own right, falls a bit short in UI design and programming finesse compared to the 4PM. It’s good, but if you’re looking for that extra layer of sophistication and reliability in software, especially under special circumstances, Futaba’s 4PM is likely the better choice. It’s all about the polish and precision in programming, and Futaba seems to have that down to an art.
Durability
In the durability department, the 4PM has a slight advantage. Why’s that? Well, its plastic casing makes it more resilient to drops. Plastic tends to absorb shocks better, which is crucial in the rough-and-tumble world of RC.
The NB4, despite its stylish metal exterior, has a couple of weak spots. First, its bezel-less large screen looks great but is more prone to damage if dropped. Screens without protective edges can be a liability. Second, its base, doubling as a battery module, also requires careful handling. A tough drop could spell trouble.
Conclusion: Which is Better?
If you’re heavily into competitive racing and require a transmitter with ultra-fast response and advanced programming capabilities, the Futaba 4PM is your go-to. Its durable plastic build and T-FHSS SR technology make it ideal for high-speed, precision-driven RC activities. Plus, Futaba’s reputation for reliability and detailed programming is a significant plus.
On the other hand, the NB4, with its stylish metal finish and 180-degree rotating wheel mount, is great for those who prioritize ergonomic comfort and flexibility. Its dual battery system and haptic feedback add to its appeal, especially for extended use in more casual or diverse RC applications like crawlers or boats.
In summary, for high-end, competitive racing where response time and programming sophistication are key, the Futaba 4PM (Plus) has the edge. But for a more versatile, comfortable, and user-friendly experience at a more attractive price point, Flysky Noble NB4 is a fantastic choice. Your decision should align with what you value most in your RC experience – speed and precision, or comfort and flexibility.
Leave a Reply