In the evolving realm of RC helicopters, two prominent models stand out – the Blade Nano S3 and the mCPX BL2. Each boasts its unique features and capabilities, and the decision between the two can be a challenge for enthusiasts. This article seeks to shed light on their differences and guide potential buyers in making an informed decision tailored to their preferences and flight aspirations. Join us as we embark on a detailed exploration of these two fascinating models.
Basic Comparison: Nano S3 vs. mCPX BL2
Durability and Reliability
While the mCPX BL2 has been described as fragile and unreliable, the Nano S3 emerges as a more resilient contender. The learning curve of piloting inevitably results in a few mishaps, and for novice pilots, the Nano S3’s ability to withstand collisions makes it a superior choice. It offers a more gentle flight experience, easier indoor navigation, and reduced potential for harm if it collides with the pilot.
Suitability for Indoor vs. Outdoor Flights
The Nano S3 is the go-to helicopter for indoor settings and breezy outdoor conditions. Its stability mode is excellent for navigating tight spaces, serving as a seamless transition to full collective pitch (CP) flight. However, one should steer clear of its “Z” stability mode, which, although beginner-friendly, holds limited utility for those with prior fixed-pitch helicopter flight experience.
Conversely, mCPX BL2 showcases better wind resistance. While Nano S3 struggles against strong outdoor winds, it still manages in light breezes.
| Specification | Nano S3 BNF | mCPX BL2 BNF |
| Tail Motor Type | Coreless | Brushless outrunner, 7700Kv |
| Skill Level | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Tail Rotor Diameter | 1.6″ (41 mm) | 1.6″ (40mm) |
| Flight Time | 4-5 minutes | 4 minutes |
| Tail Drive | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Main Rotor Blade Length | 3.3″ (84 mm) | 4.6″ (117mm) |
| Main Frame Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Completion Level | Bind-N-Fly Basic | Bind-N-Fly Basic |
| Main Rotor Diameter | 7.7″ (196 mm) | 10.3″ (263mm) |
Control and Maneuverability
Once the transmitter settings of the Nano S3 are tailored to one’s flight style, it becomes exceptionally stable and user-friendly. If your primary interest lies in indoor flight, the Nano S2 might be the better pick. On the other hand, while the mCPX BL2 offers commendable performance, its motor power and sensitivity could be overwhelming for beginners, especially for indoor flights.
Cost-effectiveness and Maintenance
From a pricing perspective, the Nano S2 BNF costs nearly half of what you’d pay for the mCPX BL2 BNF. Furthermore, replacing parts on the Nano S2 is notably cheaper. The Nano S2 helicopter also grants pilots genuine experience in “flying” a CP helicopter without stabilization.
Flight Characteristics
The mCPX BL2 boasts potency and a responsive flight, but it remains mild for beginners in the ‘Z’ stability mode. This model offers smoother and more stable flight, especially with bullet blades, helping pilots acclimate to varied flight traits. As a reliable CP trainer, mCPX BL2 aids in refining collective management skills, while Nano S2 serves as an excellent introduction to 3D flight training, compelling pilots into cyclic operations at critical moments.
Outdoor Flight Advantages
For longer flight times, the mCPX BL2 still remains superior. It outperforms especially in outdoor settings due to its higher head speed and larger blades. This translates into better wind resistance and broader effective control surfaces, rendering its flight more stable than the Nano, especially with bullet blades.
Nano S3 vs. mCPX BL2: Which is Better?
The choice between Blade Nano S3 and mCPX BL2 hinges largely on individual preferences, needs, and experience levels. For novices, especially those flying primarily indoors, the Nano S3 offers resilience against mishaps and provides a gentler learning curve. Meanwhile, more seasoned pilots or those who prefer outdoor flying might lean towards the mCPX BL2 due to its enhanced wind resistance and dynamic flight capabilities. Cost-wise, the Nano S3 emerges as the more budget-friendly option, with cheaper parts replacement. Ultimately, neither is definitively “better” – it’s all about matching the model to the pilot’s unique requirements.
Related Content:
Leave a Reply